Solved by verified expert:Week 5 – Journal LIB Exit InterviewWrite a two- to three-page journal discussing how you would improve the LIB major. What worked? What didn’t work? What do you wish you had learned that you did not learn? What was the most important thing you learned? What advice would you give future LIB majors?
week_5_grading_rubic_journel.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
LIB495.W5J1.10.2013
Description:
Total Possible Score: 3.00
Content
Total: 2.25
Distinguished – Responds with a thorough reflection that is related to all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional,
personal, relevant prior knowledge, and/or other real-world experiences in a manner that is rich in thought and provides valuable
insight into the topic. Analyzes preconceptions and biases by deconstructing elements of personal assumptions and synthesizes
own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Proficient – Responds with a reflection that is related to almost all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal,
or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides valuable insight into the topic. Provides a limited analysis of
preconceptions and biases and somewhat synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Basic – Responds with a reflection that is related to most aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other
real-world experiences in a manner that provides limited insight into the topic but may not be wholly relevant to the journal
prompt. Demonstrates self-reflection by identifying preconceptions or biases compared to new modes of thinking.
Below Expectations – Responds with a reflection that is related to some aspects of the journal prompt. Attempts to apply
professional, personal, or other real-world experiences, but their relevance to the journal prompt is unclear. Self-reflection is
vague and/or fails to relate to preconceptions or biases and new modes of thinking.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Coherence
Total: 0.45
Distinguished – Effectively communicates ideas or points in a logical and organized manner. Reflections are sophisticated and
formulate wholly appropriate and pertinent connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Proficient – Communicates ideas or points in a manner that is mostly logical and organized. Reflections formulate appropriate
connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Basic – Communicates ideas or points in a manner that demonstrates a limited understanding of content organization. Attempts
to reflect upon journal topic, but the connections between the journal topic and prior knowledge are vague.
Below Expectations – Attempts to communicate ideas or points; however, the content organization is extremely limited. Fails to
provide a reflection that connects the journal topic to prior knowledge.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Mechanics
Total: 0.30
Distinguished – Journal contains no errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
Proficient – Journal contains only a few minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, but they do not distract
the reader from the content.
Basic – Journal contains a few errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which slightly distract the reader from
the content.
Below Expectations – Journal contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which distract the
reader from the content.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Powered by
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
