Solved by verified expert:Revision needed for Strategic planning(attached), ITT below 10%… is a task that all leaders must perform. It is often easier to see what others have done in order to draw on their experience. This assignment will allow you to review three plans that you have researched.General RequirementsUse the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments(attached). It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.Using APA style for their writing assignments. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. Use the template titled “K-12StrategicPlanComparisonMatrix.DirectionsComplete the “K-12 Strategic Plan Matrix.”Compare three K-12 strategic plans. In your comparison, refer to the following categories:1. Mission, vision, and goals2. Internal and external stakeholders3. Facilities4. Professional developmentWrite a 1,000-1,250 -word synthesis of your matrix findings. Include the following:1. Which of the plans most closely aligns to the ISLLC standards?2. How was the internal and external stakeholder relationships considered in the plans?3. What are the most significant elements of governance and structure that were evident in all of the plans?4. Discuss the implications of implementing a strategic plan that aligns with ISLLC standards as it relates to continuous school improvement and sustainable change.5. How will the knowledge gathered in this assignment be used in your future?
grade_rubric.docx
k_12strategicplancomparisonmatrix.docx
k_12strategicplansmatrix.doc
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Benchmark – K-12 Strategic Plans Matrix
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than
Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Briefly
An explanation of An explanation of An explanation of
explain which of
which of the
which of the
which of the plans
the plans most
plans most
plans most
most closely aligns
closely aligns to the closely aligns to closely aligns to to the ISLLC
ISLLC standards
the ISLLC
the ISLLC
standards is
standards is not standards is
presented at a
completed.
presented, but it cursory level.
is incomplete.
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
An explanation of
which of the plans
most closely aligns
to the ISLLC
standards is
clearly presented.
Discussion is
perceptive and
thorough.
Research is from
current original
sources.
An analysis of
An analysis of
An analysis of how An analysis of how An analysis of how
how the internal how the internal the internal and the internal and
the internal and
and external
and external
external
external
external
stakeholder
stakeholder
stakeholder
stakeholder
stakeholder
relationships
relationships
relationships were relationships were relationships were
were considered were considered considered in the considered in the considered in the
in the plans is
in the plans is
plans is presented plans is clearly
plans is clearly
not presented. presented, but it at a perfunctory presented.
presented.
is incomplete.
level.
Information
Information
presented is from presented is from
scholarly, though current scholarly
dated, sources.
sources.
15.0 %Analyze how
the internal and
external
stakeholder
relationships were
considered in the
plans. Benchmarks
C. 7.3 Examine the
stakeholder
relations practices
that are necessary
to sustain the
diverse learning
infrastructure of K12 education.
15.0 %Discuss the A discussion of
most significant
the most
elements of
significant
governance and
elements of
structure that were governance and
evident in all of the structure that
plans. Benchmarks were evident in
C. 7.2 Analyze the all of the plans is
governance and
not presented.
structure of K-12
educational
institutions
including both
internal and
external
frameworks and
the leadership
practices required
in these areas.
An explanation of
which of the plans
most closely aligns
to the ISLLC
standards is clearly
presented.
Discussion is
thorough. Research
is from original,
mostly current,
sources.
A discussion of A discussion of the A discussion of the A discussion of the
the most
most significant
most significant
most significant
significant
elements of
elements of
elements of
elements of
governance and
governance and
governance and
governance and structure that
structure that were structure that
structure that
were evident in all evident in all of the were evident in all
were evident in of the plans is
plans is clearly
of the plans is
all of the plans is presented at a
presented. An
clearly presented.
presented, but it perfunctory level. example from the Information
is incomplete.
previously
presented is from
researched plans is current scholarly
offered, and an
sources.
analysis of how
history and politics
shape the vision
statement is
convincing and
detailed.
Information
presented is from
scholarly, though
dated, sources.
15.0 %Discuss the A discussion of
A discussion of A discussion of the A discussion of the A discussion of the
implications of
the implications the implications implications of
implications of
implications of
implementing a
of implementing of implementing implementing a
implementing a
implementing a
strategic plan that a strategic plan a strategic plan strategic plan that strategic plan that strategic plan that
aligns with ISLLC
that aligns with that aligns with aligns with ISLLC aligns with ISLLC
aligns with ISLLC
standards as it
ISLLC standards ISLLC standards standards as it
standards as it
relates to
as it relates to
as it relates to relates to
relates to
continuous school continuous school continuous
continuous school continuous school
improvement and improvement and school
improvement and improvement and
sustainable change. sustainable
improvement and sustainable change sustainable change
Benchmarks C. 7.5 change is not
sustainable
is presented at a is clearly
Analyze the
presented.
change is
perfunctory level. presented.
development of a
presented, but it
Information
comprehensive
is incomplete.
presented is from
learning plan for Kscholarly, though
12 education that
dated, sources.
supports
continuous school
improvement and
sustainable change
15.0 %Speculate on Speculation as to Speculation as to Speculation as to Speculation as to
how the knowledge how the
how the
how the
how the knowledge
gathered in this
knowledge
knowledge
knowledge
gathered in this
assignment be used gathered in this gathered in this gathered in this
assignment may be
in your future.
assignment may assignment may assignment may be used in the
be used in the
be used in the
used in the
learner’s future is
learner’s future is learner’s future is learner’s future is clearly presented.
not presented. present but it is presented at a
Descriptions are
incomplete.
perfunctory level. detailed.
standards as it
relates to
continuous school
improvement and
sustainable change
is clearly
presented.
Information
presented is from
current scholarly
sources.
Speculation as to
how the
knowledge
gathered in this
assignment may be
used in the
learner’s future is
clearly presented.
Descriptions are
insightful.
5.0 %Two Scholarly None of the
Not all required All required
All required
All required
Research Sources required
elements are
elements are
elements are
elements are
With In-Text
elements (two
present. One or present. Scholarly present. Scholarly present. Scholarly
Citations
topic-related
more elements research sources research sources
research sources
scholarly
are missing,
are topic-related, are topic-related are topic-related
research sources and/or one or
but the source and and obtained from and obtained from
and two in-text more sources are quality of one
reputable
highly respected,
citations) are
not scholarly
reference is
professional
professional,
present.
research or
questionable.
sources.
original sources.
topic-related.
20.0 %Organization
and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis
Paper lacks any Thesis and/or
Thesis and/or
Thesis and/or main Thesis and/or
Development and discernible
main claim are main claim are
claim are clear and main claim are
Purpose
overall purpose insufficiently
apparent and
forecast the
comprehensive.
or organizing
developed
appropriate to
development of the The essence of the
claim.
and/or vague;
purpose.
paper. It is
paper is contained
purpose is not
descriptive and
within the thesis.
clear.
reflective of the
Thesis statement
arguments and
makes the purpose
appropriate to the of the paper clear.
purpose.
8.0 %Argument
Statement of
Sufficient
Argument is
Argument shows
Clear and
Logic and
purpose is not
justification of orderly, but may logical
convincing
Construction
justified by the claims is lacking. have a few
progressions.
argument that
conclusion. The Argument lacks inconsistencies.
Techniques of
presents a
conclusion does consistent unity. The argument
argumentation are persuasive claim in
not support the There are
presents minimal evident. There is a a distinctive and
claim made.
obvious flaws in justification of
smooth progression compelling
Argument is
the logic. Some claims. Argument of claims from
manner. All
incoherent and sources have
logically, but not introduction to
sources are
uses noncredible questionable
thoroughly,
conclusion. Most
authoritative.
sources.
credibility.
supports the
sources are
purpose. Sources authoritative.
used are credible.
Introduction and
conclusion bracket
the thesis.
5.0 %Mechanics of Surface errors
Frequent and
Some mechanical Prose is largely free Writer is clearly in
Writing (includes are pervasive
repetitive
errors or typos are of mechanical
command of
spelling,
enough that they mechanical
present, but are errors, although a standard, written,
punctuation,
impede
errors distract
not overly
few may be
academic English.
grammar, language communication the reader.
distracting to the present. A variety
use)
of meaning.
Inconsistencies in reader. Correct
of sentence
Inappropriate
language choice sentence structure structures and
word choice
(register),
and audienceeffective figures of
and/or sentence sentence
appropriate
speech are used.
construction are structure, and/or language are used.
used.
word choice are
present.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format Template is not Appropriate
Appropriate
Appropriate
All format
(Use of appropriate used
template is used, template is used. template is fully
elements are
style for the major appropriately or but some
Formatting is
used. There are
correct.
and assignment)
documentation elements are
correct, although virtually no errors
format is rarely missing or
some minor errors in formatting style.
followed
mistaken. A lack may be present.
correctly.
of control with
formatting is
apparent.
5.0 %Research
No reference
Reference page Reference page is Reference page is In-text citations
Citations (In-text page is included. is present.
included and lists present and fully and a reference
citations for
No citations are Citations are
sources used in the inclusive of all
page are complete
paraphrasing and used.
inconsistently
paper. Sources are cited sources.
and correct. The
direct quotes, and
used.
appropriately
Documentation is documentation of
reference page
documented,
appropriate and
cited sources is
listing and
although some
citation style is
free of error.
formatting, as
errors may be
usually correct.
appropriate to
present.
assignment and
style)
100 %Total
Weightage
K-12 Strategic Plan Comparison Matrix
ISLLC
Standard
Mission, Vision, Goals
Plan 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Plan 2
Plan 3
Internal and External
Stakeholders
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Facilities
Plan 1
Professional Development
Plan 2
Plan 3
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Running head: K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
K-12 Strategic Plan Comparison Matrix
Grand Canyon University: EDL-827
1
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
2
K-12 Strategic Plan Comparison Matrix
Strategic planning is a burden that all leaders must accomplish. Organizations define their
strategies and make decisions on allocation of resources to pursue their plans through strategic
planning. Furthermore, strategic planning controls the mechanisms for directing the execution of
the strategies. Strategic planning became prominent in the year 1960 and was perceived as the
most vital aspect of strategic management. The process is implemented by strategists who
involve research resources and many parties in analyzing the organization and the relationship of
it with the surroundings in which it competes. There is no particular definition for the word
strategy. However, a close examination of the definitions stipulated by scholars indicates that
strategy entails determining actions to attain goals, setting goals, and allocating resources to
implement the actions. In other words, strategy prescribes how set objectives or goals will be
attained by the resources or means in place. The burden of formulating strategies in any
organization is tough, and it is borne by the executive managers.
Moreover, strategy can be planned or observed as a pattern of actions as the corporation
adapts to its surroundings or competition. It is common knowledge that planning encompasses
the process of formulation and execution or rather it aids in coordinating the two. However, the
process of formulating strategy is analytical in nature and involves synthesis. As such, tactical
planning process occurs around the policy establishment activity (Jackson & Kelly, 2002). In
education, the common question asked by employers to prospective tutors is what their
philosophy of education is. This question is perceived to be well prepared for by the teachers.
But for the leaders in a K-12 organization, they must have a philosophy and comprehension of
how their philosophy is compared to the standards of the industry, in this case ISLLC (Bestor,
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
3
1955). Therefore, this assignment helps one evaluate their philosophy as it likens to the ISLLC
standards.
Due to congested USA curriculum, there has been prolonged underachievement among
students. The students have insufficiently mastered the vital competencies due to the congestion
in the US curriculum. In other words, the high school leavers lack the simple skills and maturity.
From the K-12 planning matrix, it is plain truth that DepED is acknowledged all over the world
for the establishment of functionally educated and compassionate Americans who aid in
achieving the national goals of unity, justice, prosperity, and freedom (Bestor, 1955). The visions
are however focused on human development attained through the revised curriculum with socioeconomic significance. The missions, on the other hand, seek to provide quality essential training
that is equally accessed by all and establish a foundation for entire life training and selfactualization required for effective membership at the local, worldwide, and national wide
ambiance. With inference to the goal analysis, a common denominator is realized. The goals
seek to give every trainee an opportunity to get quality education based on revised and
decongested curriculum acknowledged globally. Besides, the goals seek to adjust how the public
perceives high training as just a preparation for campus. Rather, it should permit all to take
advantage of chances for beneficial employment or self-employment or career in promptly
fluctuating and gradually globalized surroundings. The rationale of the program to advance the
quality of essential training in the United States is considered to be critical and urgent (Jackson
& Kelly, 2002). In addition, it is true that poor quality of essential skills is mirrored in the poor
attained score in the US students.
The plans also focus on the internal and external stakeholders. The internal stakeholders
include teachers, staff workers, and the students. The external stakeholders include the
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
4
government, companies and parents. The plans related to stakeholders advocate fair treatment to
all. They seek to protect the human rights from violation. Correspondingly, they state the duties
and responsibilities of each stakeholder towards the achievement of the set goals and objective of
the institution (Freeman, Jacobs, Vining, & Rabin, 1984). Lastly, the plans focus on complains
and probable solutions to the problems. Supervisors are to recognize and keenly monitor the
fears of all genuine stakeholders, and they should take their welfare suitably into account in
operations and decision-making. With regard to facilities, the plans have a common ground that
they seek to encourage proper usage of facilities. The plans state how these facilities are accessed
and at what time are they accessible. The plans provide the guideline on how the available
facilities are shared or allocated among the stakeholders who work in one accord to attain the
same stipulated goals and objective (Freeman et al., 1984). As to professional development, the
plans go for continuous training which enhance skills and performance of an individual. The
plans also focus on the safety of the jobs, rewards, and promotions.
The Program in Informative Governance uses the ISLLC standards as prerequisite for the
learner’s Education Portfolio. There are six standards in total. The administrator is responsible
for ensuring the success of all learners by forming and overseeing the execution of a vision,
nurturing, and sustaining school culture and instructional program conducive to student training
and staff development. Eventually, this will ensuring safe environment for training, working with
the community while addressing their needs, acting with integrity and ethical manner, and finally
comprehending and influencing a larger political, cultural and social environment (Gordon,
2010). Other include influencing cultural influence, resource allocation, responding to diverse
community needs and interests, acting in fairness, collaborating with the community and
families, ensuring the efficiency and management of organizational resources, and ensuring
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
5
effective training environment. In fact, these are the key standards that the coordinator who
manages the educational program. Therefore, the best plans which are close or meet these
standards include the plans for professional development.
The relationship between the internal and external stakeholders was considered to be
mutual and beneficial to all parties. Hard work by internal stakeholders positively affected the
external stakeholders. For instance, when the training institutions ensured that they produce
competent students, then the external parties such as factories and government will enjoy the
fruits of qualified expertise. There will be increased production of goods and services, thus
improving the country’s economy and business (Green, 2008). Consequently, such quality
training prevails to be the best to both stakeholders. For students, quality training helps them
build a better future for themselves.
However, the key elements of governance structure evidence in all plans include
stakeholder relation, corporate citizenship, direction, and oversight. With reference to direction,
the tactics of this element include strategic decision making and discussing the present and future
concerns of the organization. In effect, direction is the major part of organizational governance
(Jackson & Kelley, 2002). Oversight ensures that managers act in the best interest of the
stakeholder. Under stakeholder relations governance, it entails institutional accountability to all
its stakeholder groups. Having the strategy that aligns with ISLLC standards ensures quality
training and competence among the trainees. Besides, it helps in improving performances in the
training institutions by strengthening the educational program of curriculum. The knowledge
gained from conducting such a study helps one be creative and innovative. It assists in
formulation of suitable educational programs that best fit the current state.
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
6
Collectively, strategic planning is a process in which strategies are made and
implemented. It involves the mobilization of resources and their allocation to attain the stipulated
goals. Planning also helps in decision-making process and in problem solving.
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
7
References
Bestor, A. E. (1955). The restoration of learning: A programm for redeeming the unfulfilled
promise of American education. New York: Knopf.
Freeman, J. M., Jacobs, H., Vining, E., & Rabin, C. E. (1984). Epilepsy and the inner city
schools: A school‐based program that makes a difference. Epilepsia, 25(4), 438-442.
Gordon, D. (2010). Teacher workspaces. National clearinghouse for educational facilities.
Green, R. L. (2008). Practicing the art of leadership: A problem-based approach to implementing
the ISLLC standards. Education Review//Reseñas Educativas.
Jackson, B. L., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational
leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192-212.
K-12 STRATEGIC PLAN COMPARISON MATRIX
8
Appendix
K-12 Strategic Plan Comparison Matrix
ISL
LC
Sta
nda
rd
Mission, Vision, Goals
Internal and External
Stakeholders
Facilities
Professional Development
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
1
To offer
the best
Purpose
d to
deliver
To
transfor
m
learners
To
promote
develop
ment
To treat
each
person
equally
Identify
barriers
affecting
vision
Correct
areas
with
defects
Develo
p the
goals
Develop
professio
nally
Monito
ring of
visions
Develop
planning
process.
2
Developm
ent …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
