Solved by verified expert:Textbooks:Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care, Joyceen S. Boyle & Margaret M. Andrews. (2015), 7th edition.
Chapters 14 – Cultural Competence in Ethical Decision Making. Click here to download the chapter 14
Chapters 15 – Nursing and Global Health. Click here to download the chapter 1This week you will examine how to be a patient advocate for all individuals, particularly those who are from a different culture than your own.
First, consider an ethical dilemma that you have encountered in your own nursing practice—choose one that was caused by a misunderstanding between people from different cultures. Describe that situation clearly.
How did each group or individual perceive the dilemma? (Present both sides, objectively.)
Identify the conflicting values and belief systems held by each group.
What data was missing—what information did the health care providers not have about the patient’s culture?
Next, define culturally congruent care.
ReferencesMinimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. StyleUnless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 6th edition formatting, citations and references. Click here to download the Microsoft Word APA 6th edition template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 6th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.Number of Pages/WordsUnless otherwise specified all papers should have a minimum of 600 words (approximately 2.5 pages) excluding the title and reference pages.
rubric_advocacy_and_its_role_in_cultural_diversity.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
NRSE 4570 RUBRIC: M5 A10 WA: ADVOCACY AND ITS ROLE IN CULTURAL DIVERSITY (40 pts)
Criteria
Introduction
Key Requirement
1
Key Requirement
2
Body
Key Requirement
3
Key Requirement
4
Conclusion
Last updated: 06/07/2017
Accomplished
7 to 7 Points
Clearly states the purpose of the paper.
Provides a comprehensive overview of
topic or questions.
Engages the reader.
Organized and has easy follow.
4 to 4 Points
First, consider an ethical dilemma that
you have encountered in your own
nursing practice – choose one that was
caused by a misunderstanding between
people from different cultures.
Describe that situation clearly.
6 to 6 Points
How did each group or individual
perceive the dilemma? (Present both
sides, objectively.)
Identify the conflicting values and belief
systems that were held by each side.
5 to 5 Points
What data was missing – what
information did the health care
providers not have about the patient’s
culture?
5 to 5 Points
Next, define culturally congruent care.
What culturally congruent strategies do
you recommend?
7 to 7 Points
Summarizes paper and reflects on what
the reader has learned from the paper.
Demonstrates persuasive thought and
is well organized.
Levels of Achievement
Needs Improvement
2 to 6 Points
Overview is provided, but key
points/ideas are missing.
Purpose statement is not clear.
Does not engage the reader.
Somewhat disorganized but still
comprehensible
2 to 3 Points
Ethical dilemma not fully discussed.
Missing discussion of the entire
situation.
3 to 5 Points
Discussed both sides briefly.
May be missing objectivity or full
details.
Did not discuss conflicting values and
belief systems.
3 to 4 Points
Partial discussion of what
misunderstanding was taking place.
Did not demonstrate evidence of
critical thinking on this requirement.
3 to 4 Points
Defined culturally congruent care.
Needed more detail and evidence of
critical thinking in terms of culturally
congruent strategies to apply.
2 to 6 Points
Merely summarizes the introduction
or contains new ideas not present in
the paper contents.
Somewhat disorganized but still
comprehensible.
© 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University
Not Acceptable
0 to 1 Points
Does not provide an
overview of the paper or is
absent.
No purpose statement.
0 to 1 Points
Writing is disorganized.
Difficult to follow the
writer’s train of thought.
0 to 2 Points
Writing is disorganized
and difficult to follow.
0 to 2 Points
Writing is disorganized.
Difficult to follow the
writer’s train of thought.
0 to 2 Points
Writing is disorganized.
Difficult to follow the
writer’s train of thought.
0 to 1 Points
Simply restates the
introduction or is absent.
Disorganized to the point
of distraction.
Page 1 of 2
NRSE 4570 RUBRIC: M5 A10 WA: ADVOCACY AND ITS ROLE IN CULTURAL DIVERSITY (40 pts)
Criteria
Stylistics
Accomplished
6 to 6 Points
APA Citations are appropriate.
Formatted correctly.
Reference page is complete and
correctly formatted.
At least 4 references provided: Two (2)
references from required course
materials and two (2) peer-reviewed
references. *References not older than
five years.
More than 600 words excluding title
and reference pages.
Levels of Achievement
Needs Improvement
3 to 5 Points
APA Citations are appropriate and
formatted correctly.
Reference page is formatted correctly.
References are not professional or is
not formatted correctly.
Missing 1 professional reference.
At least 600 words or more excluding
title and reference pages.
Not Acceptable
0 to 2 Points
No citations are used or
citations are made but not
formatted correctly
Reference page is missing.
Less than 600 words
excluding title and
reference pages.
Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. –), professional organizations
(NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs – National Guideline Clearinghouse).
References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical
databases.
*All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign
originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret
SafeAssign originality report.
Last updated: 06/07/2017
© 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University
Page 2 of 2
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
