Solved by verified expert:Please open 2 pictures’ files to see the questions (Do Not answer Q1, Only answer Q2 and Q3) I post Q1 because it is related to those other questions Each question should be 2 or more paragraphs long and supported (((cited)) See the direction in WORD document I attached – You have only 12 hours to finish it
a.jpg
b.jpg
ch6.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Please see the attached files (pictures), and then answer Question 2 and 3 (Note DO
NOT answer Question 1) I put Question 1 because it is related to Question 2
These questions from this book (CyberLaw Text & Cases) – Chapter 6 (Patent)
Ferrera, G., Lichtenstein, S., Reder, M., Bird, R., & Schiano, W: CyberLaw: Text and
Cases (3rd Ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western West.
Avoid plagiarism
Note: Each question should be at 2 or more paragraphs long and supported (and
cited) with information from the text and other outside resources.
To make it easy for you here you can see question 2 and 3, however you must see Question 1 I
attached (pictures)
Question 2 – Continuing from question 1, suppose you were unable to think of prior art that
might invalidate the Netflix 450 patent, or that the judge found that the prior art you presented
did not render the invention either anticipated or obvious. Present an argument that the patent
should be invalid because it does not claim patentable subject matter
Question 3 – The chapter noted that Friendster has obtained a number of social networking
patents that it could potentially assert against other social networking cites such as Facebook and
MySpace. Suppose you are corporate counsel at one of these two companies and you expect that
you may eventually be sued by Friendster. In addition to contesting the validity or enforceability
of the Friendster patents, what are some of your other options?
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
