Solved by verified expert:Evaluate two health websites using the AHRQ PEMAT rubric posted under resources. These websites can be about any health related topic that interests you. Drop the topic in your search engine and see what sites appear- that’s how your patients do it! What are they reading? is it valuable?Score the websites using the PEMAT rubric from the AHRQ website. What are the strengths and limitations of the sites? Submit the tool evaluating both sites and discuss your findings in a 3-4 page summary. The summary should include an overview of the sites you chose, a description of both the understandability and actionability subscores and the pros and cons of the sites.
pemat_assignment_grading_rubric.docx
pemat_website.docx
pemat_assignment_grading_rubric.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
PEMAT Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria
Evaluation of
quality of health
websites
including
strengths and
limitations.
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
36-40 points
All components of
discussion prompt
addressed. Welldeveloped
viewpoint showing
strong logical
thinking,
reasoning, and
analysis with
evidence and
examples.
31-35 points
Most
components of
discussion
prompt
addressed
logical thinking,
reasoning,
and/or analysis
for most part;
viewpoint is
supported with
evidence and/or
examples.
16-17 points
Somewhat clear
that readings (or
other materials)
were understood
by incorporation
into postings.
26-30 points
Minimal components
of discussion prompt
addressed Ideas
expressed are
general in nature
and/or occasionally
may not be relevant.
21-25 points
Minimal or no
components of
discussion prompt
addressed. Ideas
expressed lack
depth, are off-topic
and/or confusing
to follow.
Viewpoint, if given,
is not supported
with evidence or
examples.
/40
14-15 points
Somewhat unclear
that readings (or
other materials)
were understood by
incorporation into
postings.
/20
16-17 points
Posts show
average writing
style using
standard English
with little
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling errors.
2-3 APA errors
14-15 points
Posts show an
average and/or
casual writing style
with some errors in
spelling, grammar,
punctuation, and
usage. 4-5 APA errors
12-13 points
Postings reflects
no evidence of
understanding of
assigned readings
(or other
materials).
Short statements
such as “I agree
with…”.
12-13 points
Posts show a
below
average/poor
writing style in
terms of
appropriate
standard English
writing style,
clarity, language
used, and
grammar. >5 APA
errors
15 points
One tool
incomplete
10 points
Both tools
incomplete
Integration of
PEMAT score
findings
18-20 points
Very clear that
readings (or other
materials) were
understood by
incorporation into
postings.
Writing Quality
18-20 points
Posts show above
average writing
style and clear
using standard
English,
characterized by
elements of a
strong writing style
and basically free
from grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling errors. 0-1
APA errors.
20 points
Both tools
complete and
submitted
PEMAT
Scoring forms
Included
0 points
Tools submitted
Total
/20
/20
TOTAL POINTS (sum of all criteria)
/100
Evaluate two health websites using the AHRQ PEMAT rubric posted under
resources. These websites can be about any health related topic that interests you.
Drop the topic in your search engine and see what sites appear- that’s how your
patients do it! What are they reading? is it valuable?
Score the websites using the PEMAT rubric from the AHRQ website. What are the
strengths and limitations of the sites? Submit the tool evaluating both sites and
discuss your findings in a 3 page summary. The summary should include an
overview of the sites you chose, a description of both the understandability and
actionability subscores and the pros and cons of the sites.
This assignment should be completed using APA format with a SoN title page and
references.
https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/selfmgmt/pemat/index.html
PEMAT Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria
Evaluation of
quality of health
websites
including
strengths and
limitations.
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
36-40 points
All components of
discussion prompt
addressed. Welldeveloped
viewpoint showing
strong logical
thinking,
reasoning, and
analysis with
evidence and
examples.
31-35 points
Most
components of
discussion
prompt
addressed
logical thinking,
reasoning,
and/or analysis
for most part;
viewpoint is
supported with
evidence and/or
examples.
16-17 points
Somewhat clear
that readings (or
other materials)
were understood
by incorporation
into postings.
26-30 points
Minimal components
of discussion prompt
addressed Ideas
expressed are
general in nature
and/or occasionally
may not be relevant.
21-25 points
Minimal or no
components of
discussion prompt
addressed. Ideas
expressed lack
depth, are off-topic
and/or confusing
to follow.
Viewpoint, if given,
is not supported
with evidence or
examples.
/40
14-15 points
Somewhat unclear
that readings (or
other materials)
were understood by
incorporation into
postings.
/20
16-17 points
Posts show
average writing
style using
standard English
with little
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling errors.
2-3 APA errors
14-15 points
Posts show an
average and/or
casual writing style
with some errors in
spelling, grammar,
punctuation, and
usage. 4-5 APA errors
12-13 points
Postings reflects
no evidence of
understanding of
assigned readings
(or other
materials).
Short statements
such as “I agree
with…”.
12-13 points
Posts show a
below
average/poor
writing style in
terms of
appropriate
standard English
writing style,
clarity, language
used, and
grammar. >5 APA
errors
15 points
One tool
incomplete
10 points
Both tools
incomplete
Integration of
PEMAT score
findings
18-20 points
Very clear that
readings (or other
materials) were
understood by
incorporation into
postings.
Writing Quality
18-20 points
Posts show above
average writing
style and clear
using standard
English,
characterized by
elements of a
strong writing style
and basically free
from grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling errors. 0-1
APA errors.
20 points
Both tools
complete and
submitted
PEMAT
Scoring forms
Included
0 points
Tools submitted
Total
/20
/20
TOTAL POINTS (sum of all criteria)
/100
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
