Expert answer:We need to read two articles which I uploaded and answer six questions. The answers could be short like one or two sentences.
cognitive.pdf
commentary.pdf
the_questions.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
A. Given the following two research article critiques:
“Cognitive Impairment Associated with Toxigenic Fungal Exposure”: A Critique and Critical Analysis”
(McCaffey & Yantz, 2005)
“Commentary on ‘Cognitive Impairment Associated with Toxigenic Fungal Exposure’” (Fox, Greiffenstein,
& Lees-Haley, 2005)
1. Identify and explain the type of design you think the authors (Gordon, et al) used:
2. What hypothesis or hypotheses can you infer?
3. What appears to be the likely dependent variable? Independent variable?
4. What do the critics mean when they saying that “the generalizability of any finding” is limited?
What type of threat to validity does this condition present?
5. What might a confounding variable be?
6. Based on your knowledge of research and using the examples of these two critiques, to what
degree can a case be made that knowledge based on scientific study is more reliable than
knowledge based on tradition, authority, or everyday commonsense hunches?
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
