Solved by verified expert:Please see the WORD attached file and please provide 3 relevant law for the case (with citation) quality work and on time is something important
cyberlaw_case_4.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Victim of Hacking Into Email System Has Right to Identity of Hacker
Description
Appeals court held that a firm that had its secure email system hacked had the right to force discovery
of the person who sent emails into the hacked system, but the senders ISP first must notify the hacker
of the request so he or she can volunteer before a court order before discovery is issued.
C ASE SUMMARY
Ludlow is founder and CEO of Mobilisa, a wireless communication company that provides systems to
customers, including the military. Confidentiality is important and the company secures its systems.
Ludlow sent a personal message to a girlfriend. Six days later, a number of people, including Mobilisa’s
managers, received a copy of that email with a note: Is this a company you want to work for? The
message came via theanonymousemail.com, which is owned by TSB. Mobilisa sued John Doe
as defendants for violating federal laws regarding electronic communications and asserting a common
law claim of trespass to chattel (personal property). The company sought to subpoena the records of
TSB to obtain the identity of John Doe who sent the anonymous email. The trial court granted
Mobilisa’s request. TSB appealed. Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe, 170 P.3d 712 (Ct. App., Ariz., 2007)
Since this is the case summary, please find the whole case from the internet and
then read it, then provide 3 (Relevant Laws) and its Citation
In this list you see (3) relevant laws for this case (these 3 relevant laws are
sample) I need 3 different 3 relevant laws
https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/authorities/statutes/1285 ECPA, “Some information can be
obtained from providers with a subpoena; other information requires a special court order; and
still other information requires a search warrant. “
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/01/14/ssmanual2009.pdf
SCA, “The SCA allows the voluntary disclosure of contents when: 1) the disclosure is made to
the intended recipient of the communication, with the consent of the sender or intended recipient,
to a forwarding address, or pursuant to specified legal process, § 2702(b)(1)-(4);”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3 18 U.S. Code § 3 – Accessory after the fact,
“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives,
relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or
punishment, is an accessory after the fact.”
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
